Selective aryl hydrocarbon receptor modulators can act as antidepressants in obese female mice.

BACKGROUND: Obese females are more likely to suffer from depression and are also more likely to be resistant to current medications. This study examined the potential antidepressant-like effects of 1,4-dihydroxy-2-napthoic acid (DHNA), a selective aryl hydrocarbon receptor modulator (SAhRM), in obese female mice. METHODS: Obesity was established by feeding C57BL/6N female mice a high fat diet (HFD) for 9-10 weeks. Subsequently, mice were subjected to unpredictable chronic mild stress (UCMS) or remained unstressed. Daily administration of vehicle or 20 mg/kg DHNA began three weeks prior or on the third week of UCMS. Mice were examined for depression-like behaviors (sucrose preference, forced swim test (FST), splash and tape groom tests), anxiety (open-field test, light/dark test, novelty-induced hypophagia), and cognition (object location recognition, novel object recognition, Morris water maze). RESULTS: UCMS did not alter, and DHNA slightly increased, weight gain in HFD-fed females. HFD decreased sucrose preference, increased FST immobility time, but did not alter splash and tape tests' grooming time. UCMS did not have additional effects on sucrose preference. UCMS further increased FST immobility time and decreased splash and tape tests' grooming time; these effects were prevented and reversed by DHNA treatment. HFD did not affect behaviors in the cognitive tests. UCMS impaired spatial learning; this effect was not prevented nor reversed by DHNA. CONCLUSIONS: DHNA protected against UCMS-induced depression-like behaviors in HFD-fed female mice. DHNA neither improved nor worsened UCMS-induced impairment of spatial learning. Our findings indicate that DHNA has high potential to act as an antidepressant in obese females.

Intestinal epithelium aryl hydrocarbon receptor is involved in stress sensitivity and maintaining depressive symptoms.

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a key regulator in the microbiome-gut-brain axis, and AhR-active microbial metabolites modulate multiple neuronal responses. We recently demonstrated that 3,3'-diindolylmethane (DIM) and 1,4-dihydroxy-2-naphthoic acid (DHNA), two selective AhR modulators (SAhRMs), act as antidepressants in female mice. Thus, to examine the role of intestinal AhR in depression, anxiety, and spatial learning, this study employed transgenic mice in which the AhR was knockout only in the intestinal epithelium (AhRΔIEC). Additionally, this study examined whether the antidepressant effects of dietary DIM and DHNA is mediated by intestinal AhR. AhRΔIEC and WT female mice were fed daily with vehicle, 20 mg/kg DIM or DHNA for three weeks prior to four weeks of unpredictable chronic mild stress (UCMS). Mice were examined for weight gain, anhedonia-like behavior (sucrose preference test), anxiety levels (open field, light/dark, elevated plus maze, novelty-induced hypophagia, and marble burying tests), and spatial learning (Morris water maze). UCMS reduced weight gain in AhRΔIECs, but not WTs. Moreover, UCMS initially reduced sucrose preference in both AhRΔIECs and WTs, but over 4 weeks of UCMS, AhRΔIECs develop resilience to UCMS-induced anhedonia. Additionally, AhRΔIECs exhibit slightly reduced anxiety in certain tests and faster spatial learning. DIM and DHNA acted as antidepressants in both AhRΔIECs and WTs. Thus, this study suggests that intestinal AhR plays differential roles, mitigating stress effects on weight gain, and increasing stress effects on mood. However, the site of antidepressant action of SAhRMs, such as DIM and DHNA, is not dependent on the expression of intestinal AhR.

Sex-dependent differences in the stress mitigating and antidepressant effects of selective aryl hydrocarbon receptor modulators.

BACKGROUND: Our recent study demonstrated that selective aryl hydrocarbon receptor modulators (SAhRMs), such as 1,4-dihydroxy-2-napthoic acid (DHNA) act as antidepressants in female mice. Given that some effects of certain SAhRMs are known to also be mediated via estrogen receptor signaling, this study examined whether the effects of SAhRMs on mood, emotional state, and cognition are sex-dependent. METHODS: C57BL/6N mice were fed with vehicle or 20 mg/kg DHNA for three weeks prior to four weeks of unpredictable chronic mild stress (UCMS). Mice were examined for depression-like behaviors (sucrose preference, forced swim test (FST), splash test, tape groom test), emotional state (open-field test, light/dark test, marble burying, novelty-induced hypophagia, elevated-plus maze), and cognition (object location recognition, novel object recognition, Morris water maze). RESULTS: In females, UCMS decreased sucrose preference and increased FST immobility time; both effects were prevented by DHNA. In males, UCMS increased FST immobility time, and increased the latency to groom in the splash test. These effects were not mitigated by DHNA. However, in males, UCMS induced an increase in novelty-induced locomotion, an increase in the time spent in the light compartment in the L/D test, and an increase in the time spent with an object in a novel location. These effects were prevented by DHNA. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that DHNA has high potential to act as antidepressants in females. However, given classical interpretation, DHNA did not appear to act as an antidepressant in males. Nonetheless, our findings indicate that DHNA can mitigate stress effects and reactivity in males.

3,3'-Diindolylmethane and 1,4-dihydroxy-2-naphthoic acid prevent chronic mild stress induced depressive-like behaviors in female mice.

BACKGROUND: Current pharmaceutical treatments for depression are sometimes ineffective and may have unwanted side effects that interfere with patient compliance. This study examined the potential antidepressant-like effects of dietary- and microbial-derived aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) ligands, 3,3'-diindolylmethane (DIM) and 1,4-dihydroxy-2-naphthoic acid (1,4-DHNA). METHODS: Female C57BL/6 mice were subjected to unpredictable chronic mild stress (UCMS) or were unstressed. For three weeks prior to UCMS mice were fed daily with vehicle or 20 mg/kg DIM, 1,4-DHNA or AhR-inactive isomer 3,7-DHNA; another group was subjected to two weeks UCMS before ligand administration began. Mice were examined for anhedonia-like behavior as measured by the sucrose preference test. Additionally, anxiety levels of the mice were examined before UCMS and ligand administration began and at the end in the open field, light/dark, elevated plus maze, novelty-induced hypophagia, and marble burying tests. At the end of the experiment they were also examined in the Morris water maze (MWM) task. RESULTS: Both DIM and 1,4-DHNA, but not 3,7-DHNA, successfully prevented and reversed UCMS-induced anhedonia-like behavior. Furthermore, both DIM and DHNA had little to no effect on anxiety levels and did not induce spatial learning deficits. LIMITATIONS: Additional studies are required to determine to what degree the antidepressant-like effects of DIM and 1,4-DHNA can be attributed to their activities as AhR ligands. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that dietary and microbial-derived AhR ligands may have clinical applications as potential antidepressants. Future studies are necessary to elucidate the role of AhR in depression-like states and the underlying mechanisms of action.

Blood-brain barrier crossing using magnetic stimulated nanoparticles.

Due to the low permeability and high selectivity of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), existing brain therapeutic technologies are limited by the inefficient BBB crossing of conventional drugs. Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) have shown great potential as nano-carriers for efficient BBB crossing under the external static magnetic field (SMF). To quantify the impact of SMF on MNPs' in vivo dynamics towards BBB crossing, we developed a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for intraperitoneal (IP) injected superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles coated by gold and conjugated with poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG) (SPIO-Au-PEG NPs) in mice. Unlike most reported PBPK models that ignore brain permeability, we first obtained the brain permeabilities with and without SMF by determining the concentration of SPIO-Au-PEG NPs in the cerebral blood and brain tissue. This concentration in the brain was simulated by the advection-diffusion equations and was numerically solved in COMSOL Multiphysics. The results from the PBPK model after incorporating the brain permeability showed a good agreement (regression coefficient R2 = 0.848) with the in vivo results, verifying the capability of using the proposed PBPK model to predict the in vivo biodistribution of SPIO-Au-PEG NPs under the exposure to SMF. Furthermore, the in vivo results revealed that the distribution coefficient from blood to brain under the exposure to SMF (4.01%) is slightly better than the control group (3.68%). In addition, the modification of SPIO-Au-PEG NPs with insulin (SPIO-Au-PEG-insulin) showed an improvement of the brain bioavailability by 24.47% in comparison to the non-insulin group. With the SMF stimulation, the brain bioavailability of SPIO-Au-PEG-insulin was further improved by 3.91% compared to the group without SMF. The PBPK model and in vivo validation in this paper lay a solid foundation for future study on non-invasive targeted drug delivery to the brain.

The self-serving benefits of being a good host: A role for our micro-inhabitants in shaping opioids' function.

Opioids are highly efficacious in their ability to relieve pain, but they are liable for abuse, dependence, and addiction. Risk factors to develop opioid use disorders (OUD) include chronic stress, socio-environment, and preexisting major depressive disorders (MDD) and posttraumatic stress disorders (PTSD). Additionally, opioids reduce gut motility, induce loss of gut barrier function, and alter the composition of the trillions of microbes hosted in the gastrointestinal tract, known as the gut microbiota. The microbiota are significant contributors to the reciprocal communication between the central nervous system (CNS) and the gut, termed the gut-brain axis. They have strong influences on their host behaviors, including the ability to cope with stress, sociability, affect, mood, and anxiety. Thus, they are implicated in the etiology of MDD and PTSD. Here we review the latest studies demonstrating that intestinal flora can, directly and indirectly, by affecting sociability levels, responses to stress, and mental state, alter the responses to opioids. It suggests that microbiota can potentially be used to increase the resilience to develop analgesic tolerance and OUD.

Pre-exposure of adolescent mice to morphine results in stronger sensitization and reinstatement of conditioned place preference than pre-exposure to hydrocodone.

BACKGROUND: Opioids are commonly prescribed to treat moderate-to-severe pain. However, their use can trigger the development of opioid use disorder. A major problem in treating opioid use disorder remains the high rate of relapse. AIM: The purpose of this study was to determine whether there are differences among opioids in their ability to trigger relapse after pre-exposure during adolescence. METHODS: On postnatal day 33, mice were examined for the acute locomotor response to saline, morphine, or hydrocodone (5 mg/kg). They were administered with the corresponding opioid or saline during postnatal days 34-38 (20 mg/kg) and 40-44 (40 mg/kg). On postnatal day 45, they were recorded for the development of locomotor sensitization (5 mg/kg). Starting on postnatal day 55, mice were examined for the acquisition (1, 5, 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg), extinction, and drug-induced reinstatement (1, 2.5, and 5 mg/kg) of conditioned place preference. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the acute locomotor response to morphine and hydrocodone. Morphine induced significantly stronger locomotor sensitization as compared to hydrocodone. Pre-exposure to morphine, but not hydrocodone, sensitized the acquisition of conditioned place preference. There were no significant differences in extinction rates. Mice pre-exposed to morphine reinstate conditioned place preference after priming with a 1 mg/kg dose. In contrast, higher priming doses were required for reinstatement in all other experimental groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescent mice administered with morphine develop greater sensitization to its effects and subsequently reinstate conditioned place preference more readily than mice administered with hydrocodone. This suggests higher risk for relapse after pre-exposure to morphine during adolescence as compared to hydrocodone.

Novel Oral Nanoparticle Formulation of Sustained Release Naloxone with Mild Withdrawal Symptoms in Mice.

Chronic use of opioids can lead to tolerance, dependence, abuse, and addiction. This in turn can result in dose escalation and opioid overdose. Opioid overdose can be fatal due to severe opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD). Naloxone, a nonspecific antagonist of the mu-opioid receptors, is used for the reversal of OIRD. However, one of the major challenges of using naloxone is its short elimination half-life, which is significantly shorter compared to many opioid analgesics. Thus, renarcotization and rapid return to full respiratory depression might occur, specifically in individuals who have taken large doses or long-acting opioid formulations. Additionally, because of the very low oral bioavailability of naloxone, an oral formulation is not currently available. This study examines in mice a novel oral formulation of naloxone based on polymer nanoparticles (NP-naloxone). A single dose of 1 or 5 mg/kg NP-naloxone was highly effective at inhibiting the activating effects of repeated administration of 10 mg/kg morphine for at least up to 24 h. Onset of action was approximately 5 min. Reversal of morphine-induced locomotion was already detected within 1 min and a full effect of returning to baseline activity levels was observed within 5 min. Importantly, at 1 mg/kg, NP-naloxone precipitated very minimal withdrawal behaviors. At the 5 mg/kg dose, NP-naloxone precipitated approximately 40% of the jumping withdrawal behaviors of injectable naloxone. Thus, this study demonstrates that orally administered naloxone based on polymer nanoparticles has high potential to be developed to circumvent OIRD and withdrawal symptoms.

Buprenorphine: prospective novel therapy for depression and PTSD.

BACKGROUND: Depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are leading causes of disability and loss of life by suicide. Currently, there are less than satisfactory medical solutions to treat these mental disorders. Here, we explore recent preclinical and clinical studies demonstrating the potential of using buprenorphine to treat major depressive disorder, treatment-resistant depression, and PTSD. METHOD: Bibliographic databases were searched to include preclinical and clinical studies demonstrating the therapeutic potential of buprenorphine and the involvement of the kappa opioid receptor (KOR) in mediating these effects. RESULTS: Original clinical studies examining the effectiveness of buprenorphine to treat depression were mixed. The majority of participants in the PTSD studies were males and suffer from chronic pain and/or substance use disorders. Nonetheless, these recent studies and analyses established proof of concept warranting farther investigations. Additionally, KOR likely mediates the antidepressant and some of the anxiolytic effects of buprenorphine. Still, it appears that the full spectrum of buprenorphine's beneficial effects might be due to activity at other opioid receptors as well. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmaceuticals' abilities to treat medical conditions directly relates to their ability to act upon the endogenous biological systems related to the conditions. Thus, these recent findings are likely a reflection of the central role that the endogenous opioid system has in these mental illnesses. Further studies are necessary to study the involvement of endogenous opioid systems, and specifically KOR, in mediating buprenorphine's beneficial effects and the ability to treat these medical conditions while minimizing risks for misuse and diversion.

Response to opioids is dependent on sociability levels.

Social environment influences the trajectory of developing opioid use disorder (OUD). Thus, the present study tested the hypothesis that sociability levels will affect the responses to opioids. Mice were tested for their baseline sociability, anxiety levels, pain sensitivities, and their acute locomotor response to 5 mg/kg opioids. Then, they were administered repeatedly with saline, hydrocodone, or morphine (20 mg/kg for 5 days, and then 40 mg/kg for 5 days). Subsequently, they were examined for the expression of locomotor sensitization and retested for the effects of opioids on their sociability, anxiety levels, and pain sensitivity. On the basis of their baseline sociability level, mice were divided into socially avoiding and socially exploring. Socially avoiding and socially exploring mice did not differ in their baseline weight and anxiety sensitivities. Socially avoiding mice had slightly higher baseline heat sensitivity than those in socially exploring mice. Repeated administration of opioids had differential effects in socially avoiding and socially exploring mice. In both social groups, repeated morphine administration had overall stronger effects compared with hydrocodone. Morphine-treated socially exploring mice developed greater locomotor sensitization than those in morphine-treated socially avoiding mice. Morphine-treated socially avoiding mice, but not socially exploring mice, spent more time in the center zone of the open-field test and in the light zone of light/dark boxes, and developed heat hyperalgesia. This study suggests that socially exploring animals are more sensitive to the sensitizing effects of opioids. In contrast, opioids have greater effects on the stress and pain systems of socially avoiding animals. Thus, the underlying mechanisms for developing OUD might differ in individuals with various sociability levels.

Drug-specific differences in the ability of opioids to manage burn pain.

Burn injury pain is a significant public health problem. Burn injury treatment has improved tremendously in recent decades. However, an unintended consequence is that a larger number of patients now survive more severe injuries, and face intense pain that is very hard to treat. Although many efforts have been made to find alternative treatments, opioids remain the most effective medication available. Burn patients are frequently prescribed opioids in doses and durations that are significantly higher and longer than standard analgesic dosing guidelines. Despite this, many continue to experience unrelieved pain. They are also placed at a higher risk for developing dependence and opioid use disorder. Burn injury profoundly alters the functional state of the immune system. It also alters the expression levels of receptor, effector, and signaling molecules within the spinal cord's dorsal horn. These alterations could explain the reduced potency of opioids. However, recent studies demonstrate that different opioids signal preferentially via differential signaling pathways. This ligand-specific signaling by different opioids implies that burn injury may reduce the antinociceptive potency of opioids to different degrees, in a drug-specific manner. Indeed, recent findings hint at drug-specific differences in the ability of opioids to manage burn pain early after injury, as well as differences in their ability to prevent or treat the development of chronic and neuropathic pain. Here we review the current state of opioid treatment, as well as new findings that could potentially lead to opioid-based pain management strategies that may be significantly more effective than the current solutions.

Members of the same pharmacological family are not alike: Different opioids, different consequences, hope for the opioid crisis?

Pain management is the specialized medical practice of modulating pain perception and thus easing the suffering and improving the life quality of individuals suffering from painful conditions. Since this requires the modulation of the activity of endogenous systems involved in pain perception, and given the large role that the opioidergic system plays in pain perception, opioids are currently the most effective pain treatment available and are likely to remain relevant for the foreseeable future. This contributes to the rise in opioid use, misuse, and overdose death, which is currently characterized by public health officials in the United States as an epidemic. Historically, the majority of preclinical rodent studies were focused on morphine. This has resulted in our understanding of opioids in general being highly biased by our knowledge of morphine specifically. However, recent in vitro studies suggest that direct extrapolation of research findings from morphine to other opioids is likely to be flawed. Notably, these studies suggest that different opioid analgesics (opioid agonists) engage different downstream signaling effects within the cell, despite binding to and activating the same receptors. This recognition implies that, in contrast to the historical status quo, different opioids cannot be made equivalent by merely dose adjustment. Notably, even at equianalgesic doses, different opioids could result in different beneficial and risk outcomes. In order to foster further translational research regarding drug-specific differences among opioids, here we review basic research elucidating differences among opioids in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, their capacity for second messenger pathway activation, and their interactions with the immune system and the dopamine D2 receptors.

The role of the vasopressin system and dopamine D1 receptors in the effects of social housing condition on morphine reward.

BACKGROUND: The association with opioid-abusing individuals or even the perception of opioid abuse by peers are risk factors for the initiation and escalation of abuse. Similarly, we demonstrated that morphine-treated animals housed with only morphine-treated animals (referred to as morphine only) acquire morphine conditioned place-preference (CPP) more readily than morphine-treated animals housed with drug-naïve animals (referred to as morphine cage-mates). However, the molecular mechanisms underlying these effects are still elusive. METHODS: Mice received repeated morphine or saline while housed as saline only, morphine only, or cage-mates. Then, they were examined for the expression levels of D1 dopamine receptor (D1DR), D2 dopamine receptor (D2DR), dopamine transporter (DAT), oxytocin, and Arginine-vasopressin (AVP) in the striatum using qPCR. Additionally, we examined the effects of the AVP-V1b receptor antagonist, SSR149415, on the acquisition of morphine conditioned place-preference (CPP). RESULTS: Increased striatal expression of D1DR and AVP was observed in morphine only animals, but not morphine cage-mates. No significant effects were observed on the striatal expression of D2DR, DAT, or oxytocin. Antagonizing the AVP-V1b receptors decreased the acquisition of morphine CPP in the morphine only mice, but did not alter the acquisition of morphine CPP in the morphine cage-mate mice. CONCLUSIONS: Housing with drug-naïve animals protects against the increase in striatal expression of D1DR and AVP elicited by morphine exposure. Moreover, our studies suggest that the protective effect of housing with drug-naïve animals on the acquisition of morphine reward might be, at least partially, mediated by AVP.

Inhibiting social support from massage-like stroking increases morphine dependence.

Our previous studies showed that altering solely the drug experience of the cage mates with which rodents are housed affects the development of morphine dependence. In this study, we used designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs to artificially increase or decrease the activity of peripheral dorsal root ganglia sensory neurons expressing the G-protein-coupled receptor MRGPRB4. This is because sensory MRGPRB4-expressing neurons were shown to specifically detect the sensation of massage-like stroking resulting from social grooming, which is an important affiliative social behavior in the rodent. Blocking the sensation of social grooming in morphine-treated mice housed with drug-naive mice (i.e. morphine cage mates) significantly increased the display of jumping behavior in morphine-withdrawn animals. Activating the sensation of social grooming in morphine-treated animals housed solely with other morphine-treated animals (i.e. morphine only) did not significantly alter the display of jumping behavior in morphine-withdrawn animals. Repetitive jumping behaviors have been shown to correlate with morphine dependence. Thus, this study showed a role of social grooming in the protective effect of being housed with drug-naive mice on the development of morphine dependence. It further confirms a role of social support in the development of substance use problems.

Opioid addiction: Who are your real friends?

Opioid addiction is a chronic and relapsing mental health disorder. However, only some individuals exposed to opioids, either recreationally or during the course of pain management, will develop addiction. The reasons why some individuals develop addiction and some are spared are not fully understood. Studies indicate that it is likely a combination of genetic predispositions and environmental conditions. Given the role of environmental factors in human addiction, this review examines the role of social environments and social interactions in the development of opioid addictive-like behaviors in rodent studies. To date, three major behavioral approaches have been used in these studies, namely social isolation, environmental enrichment, and social housing with a variety of cage-mates that differ in their drug administration conditions. This review highlights the importance of an individual's social network in influencing the outcomes of drug abuse and the need to further elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying these effects. Better understanding is likely to contribute to the development of novel and more effective treatments for addiction disorders.

Hydrocodone, but Neither Morphine nor Oxycodone, Is Effective in Suppressing Burn-Induced Mechanical Allodynia in the Uninjured Foot Contralateral to the Burn.

Opioids are commonly used to treat severe, burn-induced pain. However, there is a lack of rodent studies that examine the differential effects of various opioids on burn pain. We recently demonstrated that hydrocodone was superior to other opioids in suppressing the development of burn-induced mechanical allodynia in the burned limb. This study monitored the development of mechanical allodynia and compared the abilities of morphine, oxycodone, and hydrocodone to reduce burn-induced mechanical allodynia in the limb contralateral to the burn. Mice were examined for their baseline pain sensitivity thresholds using the von Frey filaments test. Then, they were subjected to burn or sham injury and treated orally with morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone (20 or 40 mg/kg), or saline twice daily throughout the study. They were retested on days 4, 7, 11, 14, 21, and 28 postburn. Hyperalgesia was developed in the contralateral, uninjured foot beginning 21 days after the burn injury. Hydrocodone was effective in suppressing the development of burn-induced mechanical allodynia. In contrast, morphine and oxycodone had only minimal effects on the development of burn-induced mechanical allodynia. The abnormal pain sensitivities that develop as a result of burn injuries are very difficult to treat and remain a significant public health problem. More rodent studies are required to improve our understanding of the differences among the currently available opioid analgesics in order to optimize the care provided to burn victims as well as those suffering from other pain modalities.

Hydrocodone is More Effective than Morphine or Oxycodone in Suppressing the Development of Burn-Induced Mechanical Allodynia.

BACKGROUND: Pain is the most frequent complaint of burn-injured patients. Opioids are commonly used in the course of treatment. However, there is a lack of rodent studies that examine the differential effects of various opioids on burn pain. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the ability of morphine, oxycodone, and hydrocodone to suppress the development of burn-induced mechanical allodynia and reduce pain sensitivity. METHODS: Mice were examined for their baseline pain sensitivity thresholds using the von Frey Filaments test. Then, they were subjected to burn or sham injury and treated orally with morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone (20 or 40 mg/kg), or saline twice daily throughout the study. They were retested on days 4, 7, 11, 14, 21, and 28 postburn. RESULTS: In the sham animals, morphine produced significant opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH). Development of OIH was minimal for hydrocodone and was not observed for oxycodone. Secondary mechanical allodynia was observed beginning four days after the burn injury and intensified with time. All opioids produced comparable antinociceptive effects. Hydrocodone was effective in suppressing the development of burn-induced mechanical allodynia and fully treated the burn-induced increase in pain sensitivity. In contrast, morphine and oxycodone had only minimal effects on the development of burn-induced mechanical allodynia and only partially treated the burn-induced increase in pain sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that hydrocodone is effective in suppressing the development of burn-induced mechanical allodynia, while both morphine and oxycodone had minimal effects. These findings underscore the need for additional studies on the differences among various opioids using clinically relevant pain models.

Burn injury decreases the antinociceptive effects of opioids.

Burn victim patients are frequently prescribed opioids at doses that are significantly higher than standard analgesic dosing guidelines, and, even despite an escalation in opioid dosing, many continue to experience pain. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of burn injury on opioid antinociception. Mice were examined for their baseline pain sensitivity thresholds using the von Frey filaments test. Then, they were subjected to burn or sham injury to the dorsal surface of the hindpaw and treated orally with morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone (20 or 40 mg/kg), or saline twice daily throughout the study. They were retested on days 4, 7, 11, 14, 21, and 28 following the burn injury. The antinociceptive effects of the various drugs were analyzed by computing the daily difference between pain sensitivity threshold scores (in g) before and after treatment. This study showed that burn injury decreases opioid antinociception potency. A marked reduction was observed in the antinociceptive effectiveness of all opioids, and for both doses, in the burn-injured versus the sham animals. These results suggest that burn trauma limits the ability of opioids to be effective in reducing pain.

Differential Effects of Oxycodone, Hydrocodone, and Morphine on Activation Levels of Signaling Molecules.

BACKGROUND: Opioids alter the responses of D2-like dopamine receptors (D2DRs), known to be involved in the pathology of addiction and other mental illnesses. Importantly, our recent results demonstrated that various opioids differentially modulate the behavioral responses of D2DRs. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of various opioids on striatal activation levels of Akt and ERK1/2, as well as the signaling responses of D2DRs following opioid exposure. METHODS: Mice were pre-treated with 20 mg/kg morphine, hydrocodone, oxycodone, or saline for 6 days. Twenty-four hours later, mice were injected with vehicle or a D2/D3 receptor agonist, quinpirole. Thirty minutes later, dorsal striatum was collected and analyzed using Western blot. RESULTS: In morphine-pretreated animals, baseline Akt activation level was unchanged, but was reduced in response to quinpirole. In contrast, baseline Akt activation levels were reduced in mice pretreated with hydrocodone and oxycodone, but were unchanged in response to quinpirole. In mice pretreated with all opioids, baseline ERK2 activation levels were unchanged and increased in response to quinpirole. However, quinpirole-induced ERK2 activation was significantly higher than drug naïve animals only in the morphine-pretreated mice. CONCLUSIONS: Various opioids differentially modulate the baseline activation levels of signaling molecules, which in turn results in ligand-selective effects on the responses to a D2/D3 dopamine receptor agonist. This demonstrates a complex interplay between opioid receptors and D2DRs, and supports the notion that various opioids carry differential risks to the dopamine reward system. This information should be considered when prescribing opioid pain medication, to balance effectiveness with minimal risk.

Differential effects of oxycodone, hydrocodone, and morphine on the responses of D2/D3 dopamine receptors.

Oxycodone and hydrocodone are opioids which are widely used for pain management and are also commonly misused and abused. The exposure to opioid analgesics has been associated with altered responses of D2-like dopamine receptors (D2DRs). Our recent results suggest that various opioids will differentially modulate the responses of D2DRs. The D2DRs are known to be involved in the pathology of addiction and other mental illnesses, indicating the need to improve our understanding of the effects of opioid analgesics on the responses of the D2DRs. Thus, in this study, we first established equianalgesic oral doses of oxycodone, hydrocodone, and morphine using the tail withdrawal assay. Then, mice were orally administered (gavage) with the various opioids or saline once daily for 6 days. Twenty-four hours later, the mice were tested for their locomotor response to quinpirole, a D2/D3 dopamine receptor agonist. Mice pretreated with oxycodone showed significantly greater locomotor supersensitivity to quinpirole than did morphine-pretreated mice, while hydrocodone-pretreated mice showed sensitivity in between that of mice treated with morphine and oxycodone. This finding suggests that various opioids differentially modulate the responses of D2DRs. It provides further evidence supporting of the notion that various opioids carry differential risks to the dopamine reward system.